What you get: a real result
No form, no e-mail. This is the complete report of a real run, exactly as a customer receives it.
- Case: a company licence for an AI academy, our own offer
- 10 discussion rounds, 17 personas, 5 of them spoke
- Run on 25 September 2026
We use our own case on purpose. Customer documents stay confidential.
From here on it is the report, unchanged.
The answer
The department heads are likely to adopt first, procurement hesitates, and the decision hinges on the EU AI Act compliance claim.
Reaction by segment
Procurement: 4 of 5 (open)
Procurement sees the licence as a potentially valuable option but stresses the need to benchmark against other providers. Their focus on cost‑effectiveness may delay commitment until clear ROI is demonstrated.
"From a procurement perspective, the new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY seems like an interesting option, but we need to compare it with other training providers to ensure we get the best value for our money."
HRDevelopment: 3 of 5 (mixed)
HR development recognises the skill‑building potential but flags alignment with existing training budgets and priorities. Without budget certainty, HR may postpone the purchase.
"As an HR developer, I see the potential of the new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY to enhance our employees' skills in AI. However, we need to assess whether this aligns with our current training budget and priorities."
ITDepartment: 5 of 5 (convinced)
IT raises data‑protection and EU AI Act compliance questions, which could become a make‑or‑break factor. If the academy cannot satisfy these concerns, the licence may be blocked.
"The introduction of a company licence by SELVAION AI ACADEMY raises important questions about data protection and compliance with the EU AI Act. How will the academy address these concerns?"
SelinaGaertner: 4 of 5 (open)
Selina, as a senior leader, champions the licence for departmental impact and recommends early adoption. Her endorsement may drive the first pilots among enthusiastic heads of department.
"As a leader in the life sciences industry, I believe the new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY has the potential to greatly benefit our department. We should consider this option for our AI training needs."
The three strongest objections
1. Need to compare value against other providers (Procurement)
"From a procurement perspective, the new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY seems like an interesting option, but we need to compare it with other training providers to ensure we get the best value for our money."
2. Unclear if it fits training budget and priorities (HRDevelopment)
"As an HR developer, I see the potential of the new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY to enhance our employees' skills in AI. However, we need to assess whether this aligns with our current training budget and priorities."
3. Questions about data protection and EU AI Act compliance (ITDepartment)
"The introduction of a company licence by SELVAION AI ACADEMY raises important questions about data protection and compliance with the EU AI Act. How will the academy address these concerns?"
The sentence that triggered the most
"I will only build this if five companies tell me they would buy it," Selina Gaertner wrote in her draft. "I would rather have an honest no today than a platform nobody uses in six months."
It sets a clear adoption threshold that directly ties product launch to early customer commitment. This creates a decisive lever for sales and marketing to focus on securing five firm pledges.
What we would change before sending
Instead of: "It would include twelve months of access for up to 25 people in one department, a fixed 90-day learning path to start with, then new monthly units on current topics, a quarterly office hour with Selina Gaertner for the head of department, a quarterly progress report for the managing director, and documentation of training records for the duties under the EU AI Act."
Try: "The licence provides a year‑long subscription for up to 25 users, starting with a 90‑day curriculum, followed by monthly updates, quarterly office hours for department heads, quarterly progress reports for managing directors, and AI‑Act compliant training records."
Why: Clarifies the offering and highlights compliance as a distinct benefit.
Instead of: "The draft is torn between three variants: a department licence for up to 25 people at 14,900 EUR per year, a small licence for up to 10 people at 6,900 EUR per year, or per-head billing at 690 EUR per year from ten people upwards."
Try: "We propose three pricing models: a full‑department licence (≤25 users) for €14,900/year, a small team licence (≤10 users) for €6,900/year, or per‑user pricing of €690/year for groups of ten or more."
Why: Simplifies comparison and makes pricing tiers easier to communicate.
Instead of: ""I will only build this if five companies tell me they would buy it," Selina Gaertner wrote in her draft. "I would rather have an honest no today than a platform nobody uses in six months.""
Try: "The offer will proceed only after securing commitments from at least five companies, ensuring early adoption and avoiding a failed launch."
Why: Turns a personal statement into a concrete go‑to‑market criterion.
Risks of misreading these results
- Assuming the quarterly progress report is mandatory for every customer.
- Interpreting the licence as including custom in‑house training, which is explicitly excluded.
- Believing the managing director alone decides the purchase, while the head of department may drive adoption.
- Thinking the quoted prices include VAT, though the document lists net amounts.
Next steps with real stakeholders
- Interview procurement, HR, and IT stakeholders to validate cost, budget, and compliance concerns.
- Run a pilot department licence with one existing client to gather real‑world feedback.
- Clarify the decision‑making authority (managing director vs. head of department) in the sales process.
- Develop a concise EU AI Act compliance statement to address IT’s data‑protection questions.
How to read this
Synthetic personas built from your document and its context reacted over the simulated period. Resonance is a reading of tone and uptake per segment, not a measurement. Quotes are verbatim persona utterances; roles replace persona names on purpose.
Roles expected for this use case but not represented in the persona set: physicians, payers, trade press, patient advocates. Read their absence as a gap, not as agreement.
This test and the full simulation
This free test used the full report format on a short run (10 discussion rounds, 17 personas, 5 of them spoke). What a paid run adds is rounds: in the first rounds you see the immediate reaction, later rounds show what happens after that, when people answer each other, change position and camps form. That is where the sentences worth changing usually appear.
- PULSE: 490 EUR net, 24 discussion rounds: the first wave of reactions
- STANDARD: 1,490 EUR net, 72 discussion rounds: objections of the second order, when people answer each other
- DEEP DIVE: 3,900 EUR net, 168 discussion rounds: long chains of effect, including what happens after the first anger
Packages, scope and ordering: https://simulate.selinagaertner.com/pricing
Appendix A: How this simulation was set up
- Model: meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
- Simulated period: 120 hours
- One round: 60 minutes
- Channels: reddit, twitter
- Question put to the engine: Simulate how the market (physicians, hospital purchasing, payers, trade press, patient advocates) reacts to this product launch communication over the simulated period.
- Expected direction: The opinion development direction is expected to revolve around the introduction of a new company licence offer by SELVAION AI ACADEMY, with discussions focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of this offer, particularly in relation to the EU AI Act and its implications for companies in the pharma, medtech, diagnostics, and biotech industries.
- Focus topics: AI · pharma · medtech · diagnostics · biotech · company licence · EU AI Act
- Personas: 17
- Contributions: 20
Appendix B: The simulated audience
Selina Gaertner Consulting (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 2.0 · 2 posts, 5 comments per simulated hour · AI, Consulting, Industry Trends, EU AI Act, Business Development
Expert consulting services for businesses, led by Selina Gaertner, founder of SELVAION AI ACADEMY
Procurement (Procurement)
stance: neutral · influence: 1.5 · 0.5 posts, 1 comments per simulated hour · procurement, supply chain management, sustainability, industry news, best practices
Official Procurement account for a mid-sized company, sharing updates on procurement processes and best practices.
HRDevelopment (HRDevelopment)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.8 · 1 posts, 2 comments per simulated hour · HR development, training and development, organizational growth, employee development, diversity and inclusion, EU AI Act
Official HRDevelopment account, sharing insights on HR development and training for mid-sized companies.
WorksCouncil (WorksCouncil)
stance: neutral · influence: 1.2 · 0.5 posts, 1 comments per simulated hour · Employee Engagement, Workplace Wellness, Company Policies, Diversity and Inclusion, Professional Development
Official account of WorksCouncil, representing employee interests in a mid-sized company.
ITDepartment (ITDepartment)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.8 · 1.5 posts, 3 comments per simulated hour · Technology, Innovation, Cybersecurity, Digital Transformation, IT Support
Official IT Department account for a mid-sized company, providing tech support and innovations.
mid-sized company (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.0 · 3 posts, 6 comments per simulated hour · industry trends, community involvement, company news, innovation, sustainability
Official account of mid-sized company, sharing updates on our industry and community
Rheintal Diagnostics GmbH (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.5 · 1.5 posts, 3 comments per simulated hour · medical technology, diagnostics, healthcare, innovation, industry news
Official account of Rheintal Diagnostics GmbH, a leading diagnostics company
Nordwand Medizintechnik AG (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.5 · 1.5 posts, 3 comments per simulated hour · Medical Technology, Innovation, Healthcare, EU AI Act, Regulatory Affairs, Industry Trends
Official account of Nordwand Medizintechnik AG, a leading medical technology company.
Sanovis Pharma GmbH (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.5 · 1.5 posts, 3 comments per simulated hour · pharmaceutical innovation, healthcare, medical research, EU AI Act, industry trends
Official account of Sanovis Pharma GmbH, a leading pharmaceutical company
EU (Organization)
stance: neutral · influence: 2.5 · 0.2 posts, 0.5 comments per simulated hour · European integration, economic policy, social policy, environmental policy, human rights, education
Official account of the European Union, promoting unity, cooperation, and prosperity among European nations.
AI (Organization)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.0 · 3 posts, 6 comments per simulated hour · Artificial Intelligence, Technology, Innovation, EU AI Act, Training and Development
Official account of Artificial Intelligence Organization, focusing on technology and innovation
jectconsulting (Company)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.5 · 1.5 posts, 3 comments per simulated hour · Innovation, Strategy, Leadership, Digital Transformation, AI and Machine Learning, Sustainability
ject consulting - Expert solutions for a changing world
theacademy (Organization)
stance: supportive · influence: 2.0 · 2 posts, 5 comments per simulated hour · education, professional development, industry trends, technology, innovation, personal growth
Official account of the Academy, an educational organization dedicated to providing knowledge and expertise.
SelinaGaertner (Person)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.2 · 4 posts, 8 comments per simulated hour · AI, Law, Technology, EU AI Act, Innovation, Responsible AI Development
Founder/Writer, EU AI Act expert, and consultant
EU AI Act (Organization)
stance: neutral · influence: 2.8 · 0.2 posts, 0.5 comments per simulated hour · AI Regulation, EU Policy, Artificial Intelligence, Technology, Innovation, Responsible AI Development
Official EU AI Act account, providing updates and insights on AI regulation in the EU
SELVAION AI ACADEMY (TrainingProvider)
stance: supportive · influence: 2.0 · 2 posts, 5 comments per simulated hour · AI Education, AI Applications, EU AI Act, AI Ethics, Professional Development
SELVAION AI ACADEMY: Your trusted training provider for AI expertise, offering classroom seminars and video courses.
Selina Gaertner (Person)
stance: supportive · influence: 1.8 · 3 posts, 8 comments per simulated hour · Artificial Intelligence, Innovation, EU AI Act, Leadership, Consulting, Training and Development
Leader, Founder of SELVAION AI ACADEMY, and Consultant at Selina Gaertner Consulting, passionate about AI and innovation.
The full version also contains the opening posts and the complete transcript of every voice. Those come with a paid run.